How we create and update content

How pages are built

Every review on this site started as a page in the original archive. The process for each one is the same: take the best preserved copy of the page, extract the factual claims it made, discard the promotional framing and any spun or machine-translated wording, then rewrite the whole thing in our own words around the criteria we actually use.

Where the archive gave us a fact we could not confirm as current — a bonus amount, a banking method, a corporate owner — the page carries it as history rather than presenting it as live. That is why some pages read as though they are describing a point in time. They are.

What we assess

• Licensing

  Which regulator, whether that regulator publishes a searchable register, and what recourse exists if a dispute is not resolved.

• Market reality

  Which countries and states the operator genuinely serves, rather than the list in its marketing.

• Banking

  Deposit and withdrawal routes, verification requirements, published processing times and fees.

• Terms

  Wagering requirements, expiry windows, game weighting, maximum bets and withdrawal caps, read as a whole.

• Games

  Depth and quality of the library, and whether the software is in-house or licensed.

• Player controls

  Deposit limits, time-outs, reality checks and self-exclusion, and how easy they are to find.

What we do not do

We do not claim to have tested every operator with real money, and we do not publish star ratings or "best casino" rankings. We do not accept payment to change what a review says, and advertising on the site is independent of editorial content — see the advertising disclosure.

Updates and corrections

Pages carry a last-updated date. Reviews are revisited when an operator's licensing, ownership or banking changes materially, and corrections are applied as soon as they are verified rather than batched into a later cycle. If you spot something wrong, the contact form is the fastest route and corrections are logged.